Risks Versus Benefits of Nonsubscriber Employer Status in Texas: An Outside Counsel Perspective
In Texas, opting out of workers' compensation (becoming a "nonsubscriber") frees businesses from mandatory coverage but exposes them to direct lawsuits for employee injuries, risking significant damages including pain, suffering, and lost wages, unlike the fixed benefits of traditional workers' comp; while nonsubscribers lose defenses like contributory negligence, the ability to argue shared fault remains, creating a calculated risk-benefit analysis balancing system avoidance against potentially unlimited liability, a complex choice requiring deep legal counsel for Texas companies.
The Texas Choice: Nonsubscription's Double-Edged Sword for Employers
Texas stands unique as the only state not requiring private employers to carry workers' compensation, allowing businesses to opt-out, or "nonsubscribe," to the system, a choice that fundamentally alters risk management for workplace injuries; instead of guaranteed, no-fault benefits, an injured worker becomes a plaintiff in a personal injury lawsuit, opening the door for claims of medical bills, lost earnings, and even catastrophic pain and suffering, all while the employer loses traditional defenses, creating a potentially massive financial liability for a single incident.
Weighing the Costs: Risks vs. Benefits
For companies, nonsubscription offers perceived savings on insurance premiums and avoids the administrative burden of the workers' comp system, but this is offset by substantial risks: the removal of core legal defenses, such as arguing an employee's own negligence contributed to their injury, means the employer faces a higher burden to prove their case, while the employee gains the right to sue for broad damages, a stark contrast to the capped, specific benefits of traditional workers' comp.
The Attorney's Perspective: Strategic Exposure
From a corporate counsel's viewpoint, nonsubscription presents a strategic gamble; the attraction lies in avoiding the steady cost of premiums, but the danger is the shift from predictable insurance payouts to unpredictable, potentially enormous jury awards in fault-based lawsuits, especially given recent court rulings affirming some shared liability defenses for nonsubscribers, making careful risk assessment paramount.
The Employee's Side: A Path to Broader Recovery
For an injured employee, foregoing workers' compensation means sacrificing guaranteed medical coverage and lost wage payments for the chance to pursue a tort claim against their employer, seeking full compensation for all damages, including non-economic losses like pain and suffering, which workers' comp typically doesn't cover, potentially leading to greater recovery if the employer is found negligent.
The Bottom Line: A High-Stakes Decision
The decision to be a Texas nonsubscriber is a high-stakes legal and financial gamble, trading controlled, albeit limited, workers' comp benefits for the freedom to avoid the system but accepting exposure to unlimited liability, demanding robust internal safety protocols, transparent policies, and experienced legal counsel to navigate the complex interplay of employee rights and employer obligations in this unique Texas landscape.
Need to learn more? Get in touch.